ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Glob. Women’s Health

Sec. Contraception and Family Planning

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1516757

Contraceptive use and decision-making in Guera, Chad: a mixed-methods study

Provisionally accepted
Vincent de Paul  AllambademelVincent de Paul Allambademel1Mahamat  AbdelazizMahamat Abdelaziz1Natalie  AndraskoNatalie Andrasko2Bongo  GoumboBongo Goumbo3Robert  MadjigotoRobert Madjigoto1Alexis  NgarmbatedjimalAlexis Ngarmbatedjimal1Solal  NoubadjimSolal Noubadjim1Salomon  TamiraSalomon Tamira1Theodora  VarelisTheodora Varelis2Katchebe  VourbaneKatchebe Vourbane3Sara  E CaseySara E Casey2*
  • 1Laboratoire de Sociologie, d’Anthropologie et des Etudes Africaines (LASA), Department of Sociology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of N'Djamena, N'Djamena, Baguirmi, Chad
  • 2Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, United States
  • 3International Rescue Committee, N'Djamena, Chad

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Chad has one of the highest maternal mortality ratios in the world, and low modern contraceptive prevalence. Understanding the barriers and influences on women’s decision-making around contraceptive use is critical to reducing the unmet contraceptive need, and thus maternal mortality.Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted in three districts of Guéra province, Chad, including a longitudinal survey of women, focus group discussions with male and female users and non-users of modern contraceptives, and in-depth interviews with midwives, community health workers, and community leaders.Results: Survey participants showed increased knowledge of modern contraceptive methods, and 20.5% reported current modern contraceptive use at endline. Participants described multiple reasons for contraceptive non-use, including that it contradicts with their religious beliefs, community stigma and widespread misconceptions, particularly around long-acting reversible contraceptives. Husbands played a large role in a couple’s contraceptive decision-making, as either a major facilitator or barrier depending on the individual. Discussion: Overall, the study’s findings suggest that participant awareness of modern contraceptive methods increased. Contraceptive use was more than twice as high as the provincial rate. Given the dominance of injectables within our sample, programs should explore introducing and scaling community-based distribution of the self-injectable contraceptive (DMPA-SC). The findings highlight the need for more diverse and tailored stigma reduction interventions in the community to promote awareness and reduce misconceptions of modern contraceptives among key groups of people, including men, couples, and religious and other community leaders. Values clarification and attitude training should be considered for all cadres of providers to promote non-discrimination and equity in contraceptive service provision.

Keywords: Contraception, Chad, Sexual and reproductive health, mixed methods, decision-making

Received: 24 Oct 2024; Accepted: 28 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Allambademel, Abdelaziz, Andrasko, Goumbo, Madjigoto, Ngarmbatedjimal, Noubadjim, Tamira, Varelis, Vourbane and Casey. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Sara E Casey, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

OSZAR »